Tuesday, October 9, 2007

AIM Chat

Okay so here's the transcript from the AIM Chat during today's class -with a few minor edits like the preliminary stuff which had absolutely nothing to do with anything as there was no discussion going on at that point.
If anyone who was not involved in this discussion would like to be, just let me know what your screenname is so I can invite you next time.
Voila-

James (11:22:06 AM): hola

Autumn (11:22:12 AM): hola

Travis (11:22:18 AM): wordddd

Travis (11:22:47 AM): jackson is probably still mouring those yankees

Autumn (11:22:51 AM): hahaa

James (11:22:57 AM): yea baby

Lauren L (11:23:02 AM): grrrr travis

Autumn (11:23:12 AM): yeah so i figure we can comment on convos on here & not have to wait to jump in til he calls on all of us

James (11:23:26 AM): yea good call

Lauren L (11:23:27 AM): smart thinking

Lauren S (11:30:04 AM): doodle doodle hey

Ashley (11:30:06 AM): huh??

Autumn (11:30:41 AM): poor ian..

Ashley (11:30:46 AM): aw ian..your identity!

Travis (11:30:55 AM): yeah we dont want you to lose your identity

Travis (11:30:58 AM): you gotta be assertive man

Lauren L (11:30:59 AM): not just identity... ontological identity.....

Autumn (11:31:01 AM): change it! go constructivist!

Travis (11:31:05 AM): haha

James (11:31:14 AM): all the way

Travis (11:31:21 AM): well wouldn't realist ian just kick the crap out of creepy ian

Lauren L (11:31:27 AM): haha

Ian (11:31:30 AM): good idea trav

James (11:31:35 AM): yea

Autumn (11:31:37 AM): our ian's the default - creepy ian's obviously the other.. duhh

Ian (11:31:42 AM): except he might bite me and then i'll get rabies

Autumn (11:31:45 AM): ahhah

Travis (11:32:15 AM): yeh you gotta represent

Travis (11:33:54 AM): ians gotta bond together

Lauren L (11:34:10 AM): i like this conversation...

James (11:34:17 AM): yea its good

Lauren L (11:35:46 AM): ash/autumn i'm totally tempted to tell the story about what happened when we were passing eaglesnest

Autumn (11:36:14 AM): hahahah

Travis (11:36:16 AM): i just think its funny that we are picking on a real person

Travis (11:36:22 AM): hope he doesn't walk in

Autumn (11:36:23 AM): yeahh...

Lauren L (11:36:34 AM): apparantly i let him into an elavator...

James (11:36:50 AM): haha

Autumn (11:36:52 AM): haha yeahh you did lol

Lauren L (11:37:20 AM): should i tell the story?

Travis (11:37:27 AM): dooo it

Autumn (11:37:29 AM): go for it!

Ashley (11:38:31 AM): that was amazing

Autumn (11:38:37 AM): lots of individual experiences that correlate = he's actually creepy.

Travis (11:38:48 AM): he should feel honored we are dedicating a class to him...

James (11:38:51 AM): haha yep

Lauren L (11:38:52 AM): lol

Autumn (11:38:55 AM): lmao

Sam (11:38:57 AM): haha

Ashley (11:39:05 AM): what if he walked by

Ashley (11:39:12 AM): i would cry - id feel so bad

Autumn (11:39:13 AM): that would be so hilarious

Lauren L (11:39:15 AM): that would be amazing

Lauren L (11:39:28 AM): cool

Autumn (11:39:32 AM): it's not like he'd hear what's going on in the classroom ashley

Travis (11:39:39 AM): hah yeh

Travis (11:39:39 AM): lizzzzz

Liz (11:39:43 AM): travey poo

Travis (11:41:09 AM): ok kids lets keep it professional

Travis (11:41:09 AM): haha

James (11:41:10 AM): how are you enjoying this conversation?

Travis (11:41:23 AM): yeah liz do you know creepy ian?

Liz (11:41:33 AM): no i dont

Autumn (11:41:38 AM): i like how ptj keeps tying back to ir theory & then we just tell more stories.. oops we should prolly stop that

Liz (11:41:39 AM): y the hell are we talking about him. im confused

Travis (11:41:44 AM): i dont know if he is a threat to our survival as a floor

Travis (11:41:56 AM): is he dangerous? haha

Autumn (11:42:03 AM): quite possibly ..?

Lauren L (11:42:06 AM): i still hafta say sublimilly, game?

Sam (11:42:19 AM): we could gang up. im sure all of us could take him on

Travis (11:42:28 AM): oh.. that is creepy

Autumn (11:42:30 AM): scaryyyy!!

Ashley (11:42:32 AM): yea

Travis (11:42:47 AM): we should let creepy ian testify or something

Ashley (11:42:51 AM): and apparently there are theories about other things he did that they cant prove

Lauren L (11:43:22 AM): wanna share?

Travis (11:43:28 AM): oh yah well ian is so cool he can't be brought down by larry

Autumn (11:43:38 AM): wait what?

Ian (11:43:38 AM): i don't want to lose my identity

Ashley (11:43:55 AM): no its inappropriate and idk how true or not it is they just have suspicians

Travis (11:43:55 AM): i don't blame you he has it comin to him

Autumn (11:44:04 AM): we dont know his last name..

Travis (11:44:04 AM): it is to warn people duh

Travis (11:44:07 AM): yeah

Autumn (11:44:11 AM): yeah that's pretty important too

Travis (11:44:19 AM): creepy pretty much says it all

Travis (11:44:25 AM): covers all the bases

Autumn (11:44:51 AM): obviously!

Travis (11:45:00 AM): wait what class are we in?

Autumn (11:45:06 AM): i cant remember...

Travis (11:45:07 AM): ohh yeah

Autumn (11:45:12 AM): titus remind us again?

Ashley (11:45:19 AM): lol

Travis (11:45:20 AM): yes, please

Autumn (11:45:22 AM): oh yeah wp!

Sam (11:45:31 AM): haha

Travis (11:45:37 AM): lol "agressive"

Travis (11:45:45 AM): thats one way to put it i suppose

Autumn (11:45:46 AM): yay for cool smilies!

Ashley (11:45:48 AM): no they run away from him

Ian (11:45:48 AM): he's the creeps freedom fighter

Lauren L (11:45:50 AM): .... if he has friends...

Ashley (11:45:58 AM): i've seen it

James (11:46:02 AM): johnny is his friend

Travis (11:46:09 AM): little johnny

Travis (11:46:13 AM): ow ow

Ashley (11:46:16 AM): he doesnt like him

James (11:46:22 AM): oo

James (11:46:30 AM): whatevs then

Autumn (11:46:33 AM): johnny doesnt like ian or the other way around? je suis confu

Lauren L (11:46:37 AM): johnny's creepy too though, right?

Ashley (11:46:40 AM): the way you said

Autumn (11:46:48 AM): o ok

Ashley (11:46:49 AM): johnny is just very socially awkward

Travis (11:46:50 AM): yeah maybe they are like a little creepy army

Lauren L (11:46:57 AM): haha

Travis (11:47:09 AM): well the evidence is there...

Travis (11:47:16 AM): i think there is solid proof

Travis (11:47:19 AM): right?

Travis (11:47:22 AM): jams and whatever

Autumn (11:47:27 AM): but then you're on your guard when you actually meet him & you can be careful!

Ian (11:47:38 AM): i'll say it to his face

Ian (11:47:49 AM): he brings shame to the noble name of ian

Autumn (11:47:52 AM): hhahha

Lauren S (11:47:56 AM): that's awful

James (11:47:57 AM): yea dude

Travis (11:47:59 AM): well i don't know though if these preconceived nothions are valid until you have a creepy experience

Autumn (11:48:18 AM): true true

James (11:48:21 AM): id say the jams thing is pretty creepy

Sam (11:48:24 AM): but do you want to have a creepy experience is the question?

James (11:48:31 AM): exactly

Autumn (11:48:38 AM): no. not really.

Liz (11:48:52 AM): sorry guys

Autumn (11:48:56 AM): that's a good question...

Liz (11:48:58 AM): i dont get the point of this conversation

Autumn (11:48:58 AM): idk?

Liz (11:49:02 AM): and think its kinda dumb

Sam (11:49:02 AM): yea the mouse experience i had was slightly creepy

Ian (11:49:09 AM): did you read enloe?

Autumn (11:49:18 AM): yepp

Liz (11:49:18 AM): yes i did

Liz (11:49:22 AM): but get a better example

Travis (11:49:27 AM): yeh it was kind of out there

Liz (11:49:31 AM): one with relevance?

James (11:49:35 AM): id prefer a better example

Travis (11:49:45 AM): yeh we are taking this to far

Lauren L (11:49:46 AM): how did this even start?

James (11:49:52 AM): idk

Liz (11:49:53 AM): yeah

Autumn (11:50:07 AM): ....

Travis (11:50:19 AM): yeah this is totally irrelivant why don't we talk about enloe

Travis (11:50:20 AM): yeah

Travis (11:50:36 AM): this really isn't going anywhere

Sam (11:50:41 AM): no no its not

Travis (11:50:47 AM): we can talk about mexican peasant uprisings

James (11:50:50 AM): not at all

Travis (11:50:51 AM): or something

Liz (11:51:00 AM): something with substance

Sam (11:51:11 AM): the blackwater mercenaries haha

James (11:51:20 AM): yea lets go with that

Liz (11:51:24 AM): someone say that

Autumn (11:51:26 AM): go for it

James (11:51:27 AM): its more interesting anyway

Travis (11:51:27 AM): well i mean according to the article shouldn't we be worried that creepy ian is gonna rise up against us

Liz (11:51:34 AM): travis

Travis (11:51:38 AM): haha

Liz (11:51:41 AM): please

Travis (11:51:41 AM): yes?

Liz (11:51:48 AM): be sexy and be queit

Travis (11:51:53 AM): ok, ok we will try and shift the conversatino

Ian (11:51:58 AM): well in response to shultzy, is it fair for me to be brought down by this ian?

Lauren S (11:52:12 AM): no

Liz (11:52:17 AM): no ian

Ian (11:52:17 AM): i think its my duty to make the delineation

Liz (11:52:19 AM): but its not about u

Travis (11:52:23 AM): well he shouldnt affect you i mean you should be able to maintain your image

Liz (11:52:25 AM): u have hte same name

Liz (11:52:27 AM): sucks

Liz (11:52:29 AM): but watever

Travis (11:52:55 AM): yeah let's just talk about something else i don't want to spend a whole class on ian

Ian (11:52:59 AM): same actually

Liz (11:53:02 AM): i agree. sorry ian

Ian (11:53:03 AM): we are getting off it now

Lauren S (11:53:09 AM): ouch

Lauren S (11:53:09 AM): hahha

James (11:53:10 AM): sort of

James (11:53:29 AM): why are we talking about how to talk about people?

James (11:53:37 AM): and the n word

Ashley (11:53:37 AM): were really just using it as a model, I dont really think that it matters how well or not well we know him because were taking it out to use to explain things. we arent discussing ian we're discussing marginalization

Travis (11:53:51 AM): yeah but its just disrespectful i think

Lauren L (11:53:53 AM): because labels leads to otherization

Travis (11:54:01 AM): we should use a broader example

Ian (11:54:03 AM): except some people haven't read enloe so don't know this

Travis (11:54:11 AM): well screw them

Travis (11:54:14 AM): they should have done the hw

Ashley (11:54:18 AM): I mean everything is relative. I feel like you cant give people some sort of label if you have no basis or knowledge for it

Autumn (11:54:34 AM): yeah but once you have some knowledge then ...

Autumn (11:55:18 AM): isnt queer eye starting soon?

Travis (11:55:23 AM): i hope so man

Ashley (11:55:26 AM): lol i dont know

Autumn (11:55:31 AM): lauren l- we were talking about it before do you know?

Sam (11:55:35 AM): idk dont watch the show

Lauren L (11:55:37 AM): we don't get bravo so it doens't matter

Travis (11:55:41 AM): oh crapp

Autumn (11:55:43 AM): awwww mann...

Travis (11:55:48 AM): way to be a downer

Ashley (11:55:53 AM): i also think that it really depends whether or not your welcomed into the community whether or not you can use your terms

Lauren L (11:55:56 AM): sorrrry

Liz (11:55:56 AM): travis ur always a downer

Travis (11:56:05 AM): so...hows that paper gonig for y'all?

Autumn (11:56:20 AM): ... lets not discuss that.

Travis (11:56:27 AM): haha ok ok

Travis (11:56:29 AM): fair enough

Autumn (11:57:04 AM): except that just saying we should move away from a word doesnt mean that people will actually do it

Lauren L (11:57:15 AM): yeah

Sam (11:57:25 AM): also the meaning of words change. degrading words or otherwise

Travis (11:57:27 AM): well its an understanding or a social norm

Travis (11:57:36 AM): didn't you watch the daily show yesterday

James (11:57:36 AM): yea thats true

Travis (11:57:44 AM): words are losing their definitions

Autumn (11:57:44 AM): no

Travis (11:57:52 AM): its a serious matter

James (11:57:54 AM): it was good

Travis (11:57:54 AM): haha

Lauren L (11:58:07 AM): find the clip and play it?

James (11:58:16 AM): we could

Travis (11:58:18 AM): haha maybe

Autumn (11:58:18 AM): i mean no i didnt watch it not no words are losing their definitions... definitions are always changing

Autumn (11:58:28 AM): pirates & emperors!

Autumn (11:58:35 AM): pirates of the caribbean!

Travis (11:58:38 AM): we dont have the AV stuff

Autumn (11:58:42 AM): yeah w/e

Sam (11:58:43 AM): ewww not that movie

Lauren L (11:58:49 AM): you have ur laptop ...

Travis (11:58:57 AM): savvy

Autumn (11:59:02 AM): you could send the link around & we could watch on various laptops throughout the room savvy?

Travis (11:59:19 AM): perhaps

James (11:59:21 AM): lets stop saying savvy savvy?

Autumn (11:59:29 AM): savvy.

Autumn (11:59:46 AM): aww the squirrels!

Travis (11:59:55 AM): wouldnt it be better if instad of marginalize we just used pick on or opress

Sam (12:00:03 PM): haha the three subspecies of the squirrls yay!

Lauren L (12:00:09 PM): my friend got really drunk once, and her roomate had a picture of pirates of the C on her wall, and she told her roomate to "tell johnny depp to stop moving and why is orlando bloom so angry"

Autumn (12:00:18 PM): hahaha

James (12:00:36 PM): jackson can see my computer

James (12:00:40 PM): just so you know

Autumn (12:01:00 PM): but travis- marginalize sounds less harsh & thus we use it because we want to sound nicer than if we said 'pick on' or 'oppress'

Lauren L (12:01:09 PM): hahaha oops

Travis (12:01:23 PM): although we cant watch it

Travis (12:01:26 PM): without sound

Autumn (12:01:26 PM): well we're posting it anyways...

Travis (12:01:27 PM): so w/e

James (12:01:34 PM): marginalize is a word whose meaning is just more positively pitched

Autumn (12:01:39 PM): exactly

Sam (12:01:43 PM): wow this was so english class with the use of slanting words haha

Travis (12:01:47 PM): yeah haha

Lauren L (12:02:02 PM): yup sam

Autumn (12:02:19 PM): wow...

Travis (12:02:22 PM): this clip is actually really good it talks about freedom of speech and personal opinion, etc

Autumn (12:02:31 PM): yeah something should have happened though!

Travis (12:02:38 PM): you should watch it later or something

Autumn (12:02:49 PM): post the link & we can watch it later/mention it in blogs

James (12:02:53 PM): yea we should

James (12:02:59 PM): yea

Travis (12:03:05 PM): yeah i posted it up there but i can repost it later

Autumn (12:03:22 PM): up where? it's not in this convo...?

Liz (12:03:27 PM): i always sound like im gonna cry in this class

Travis (12:03:29 PM): is it not

Liz (12:03:49 PM): ..random...

Autumn (12:03:53 PM): no- you definitely had reason to get mad about that!

Autumn (12:04:07 PM): i would too - that's totally awful

Travis (12:04:14 PM): whatever the URL is too long

Travis (12:04:17 PM): i will put it somewhre else

Liz (12:04:27 PM): ha thanks...

James (12:04:31 PM): whats awful?

Autumn (12:04:38 PM): copy... paste... it doesnt really matter if it's long lolll

James (12:04:42 PM): the nword thing?

Autumn (12:04:48 PM): yeahhh

James (12:05:02 PM): its really not that bad

Travis (12:05:11 PM): no AIM has a limit on how long your messge can be

Autumn (12:05:20 PM): really? i never knew that..

James (12:05:23 PM): words are words. thy get their meaning because of how we use them

Autumn (12:05:28 PM): alrite some other time then

Travis (12:05:35 PM): yeah exactly they are so arbitrary

Travis (12:05:43 PM): i'll say it i don't care

Travis (12:05:52 PM): well i mean i do care

James (12:05:52 PM): i will too

Travis (12:05:56 PM): but i will still say it

Autumn (12:06:11 PM): i wouldnt want to..

James (12:06:18 PM): i care, but you can say it if you feel the need to

Liz (12:06:23 PM): i disagree

Ashley (12:06:28 PM): i wont just because it carries so much history and neativity tied to it but thats what people make it

James (12:06:29 PM): what if you used it positively?

Travis (12:06:36 PM): dude i will call a fat person a fat person

Liz (12:06:38 PM): how can u use it positively

Travis (12:06:39 PM): ...no

Travis (12:06:40 PM): i wont

Ashley (12:06:41 PM): if people decided it wasnt negative anymore that would even be better

Liz (12:06:46 PM): when it has been taught that its a negative word?

Travis (12:06:50 PM): well you can't there is too much history

Travis (12:07:03 PM): you can't just decide to change a word its way easier to just have ppl stop using it

James (12:07:10 PM): just say it when describing a positive attribute of a black person

Autumn (12:07:16 PM): yeah but i dont think that you can use it positively . i mean white people just cant say it positively because of the history...

Liz (12:07:21 PM): how would u make that sound positive

Lauren L (12:07:23 PM): that's not gonna work...

Ashley (12:07:32 PM): there are ways that you can get past it though, people revitalize neighborhoods that had previously been associated with crime and poverty

Travis (12:07:33 PM): you wouldn't the only thing you can do its just not use it

Travis (12:07:36 PM): or not care

James (12:07:38 PM): cuz youre thinking too deeply into the word

Ashley (12:07:41 PM): eventually that association goes away

Travis (12:07:47 PM): i dont think it does

Ashley (12:07:47 PM): why should this be any different

Liz (12:07:48 PM): but how can u not think deepy?

James (12:07:48 PM): in its most basic form, it denotes black person

Liz (12:07:53 PM): words go hand in hand with feeligns

James (12:07:56 PM): youre letting the history clod the true meaning of it

Liz (12:07:58 PM): they bring up feelings and emotions

Travis (12:07:58 PM): yeah but pop culture says differently

Liz (12:08:03 PM): and a word like that

Lauren L (12:08:05 PM): then just say black, there

Liz (12:08:06 PM): that has such depth

Ashley (12:08:08 PM): im still not saying that its right to say but i do think that if it was focused on it could be changed

Travis (12:08:09 PM): its just got bad connotations

Lauren L (12:08:09 PM): s no need to use the nword

Liz (12:08:09 PM): cannot be ogtten rid of

Travis (12:08:20 PM): yeah you aren't gonna change it

James (12:08:28 PM): see i love what a simple comment can do

Travis (12:08:28 PM): its not worth the trouble

Lauren L (12:08:29 PM): then just say black, no need to use the n word*

Autumn (12:08:35 PM): exactly

James (12:08:38 PM): i would never say it, but look how active evryone got

Autumn (12:08:50 PM): except you said that you would...

Lauren L (12:08:50 PM): because u said u'd say it lol

Liz (12:08:51 PM): ....wow

Travis (12:09:17 PM): well i mean its just a word...if i locked myself in a room and shouted the nword no one would know

Travis (12:09:19 PM): and it would mean nothing

James (12:09:21 PM): i know what i said

Autumn (12:09:27 PM): i dont think it's a problem to use descriptions as long as they're not derogatory in any sense

James (12:09:27 PM): that doent mean i believe it

Travis (12:09:50 PM): its all about how each person involved takes the word

Travis (12:09:56 PM): some people might not care

Travis (12:10:05 PM): it just depends ya know

James (12:10:06 PM): exactly

James (12:10:24 PM): a word is a word

James (12:10:31 PM): connotation is different

Travis (12:10:33 PM): black actually makes more sense

James (12:10:42 PM): it does

Travis (12:10:44 PM): not many black ppl have ever been to africa

Liz (12:10:50 PM): word

Travis (12:10:50 PM): so...yeah

Lauren S (12:10:54 PM): nor are from africa

Autumn (12:10:55 PM): yepp

James (12:10:58 PM): many arent even from africa

Lauren S (12:11:01 PM): there are people from the caribbean

Lauren S (12:11:03 PM): and such

James (12:11:06 PM): yea

Lauren L (12:11:13 PM): the offiice james!

James (12:11:18 PM): i had a friend who was latin

James (12:11:21 PM): yes!

James (12:11:30 PM): and he asked us to refer to him as black

Lauren S (12:11:36 PM): yep

Lauren S (12:11:45 PM): b/c that's how the latinos deal w.it

Travis (12:11:51 PM): i mean really the only time i use the term black is when i need to describe someone to someone

James (12:11:54 PM): african-american just wasnt true

Travis (12:11:55 PM): like if they are looking for them

James (12:11:56 PM): exactly

Travis (12:12:00 PM): its nothing derrogatory

Autumn (12:12:10 PM): yeah it just is.

James (12:12:14 PM): mhmm

Travis (12:12:16 PM): but how else are you going to distinguish

Lauren S (12:12:30 PM): do you call yourself a european american?

Autumn (12:12:34 PM): "african american" is just such a mouthful..

Liz (12:12:36 PM): y do we need to distinguish?

Autumn (12:12:38 PM): nooo haha

Travis (12:12:41 PM): i mean, some people might say you dont need to distinguish, that is houldnt matter

Liz (12:12:43 PM): thought id be annyoing

Travis (12:12:44 PM): yeah

Lauren S (12:12:45 PM): then why would you say african american?

Travis (12:12:47 PM): exactly

Autumn (12:12:51 PM): exactly.

Travis (12:12:58 PM): i mean i suppose it really shouldn't matter

Liz (12:13:02 PM): i know

Liz (12:13:12 PM): its kind of troublesome thinking about it

Travis (12:13:20 PM): but its just in our nature to notice things that are different

Liz (12:13:25 PM): we are arguing on how to refer to people

Travis (12:13:36 PM): if two ppl are together youd say, "a black man and a white man"

Travis (12:13:43 PM): most likely

Lauren L (12:13:45 PM): but then, if there's a group of black kids and one white kid is ti bad to be like "oh she's the white one"? it's the same idea...

Lauren S (12:13:48 PM): there's no problem saying someone is black. the problem is when you say you hate black people

Lauren L (12:13:55 PM): yeah i agree

Travis (12:13:56 PM): yeah right

Travis (12:13:59 PM): thats it

Liz (12:14:02 PM): agreed lauiren

James (12:14:03 PM): yea

Liz (12:14:03 PM): lauren

Lauren S (12:14:12 PM): black ppl don't care if you call them black

Travis (12:14:20 PM): but i think a lot black people might think the word black equals hatred or condesending

Lauren S (12:14:38 PM): ou of all the black ppl i've ever talked to, i've never heard that

Travis (12:14:39 PM): but if you think about it it is just a word and it is just logical

Travis (12:14:45 PM): well im just saying

Travis (12:14:49 PM): perhaps

Lauren L (12:14:49 PM): unless you link "black" with some sort of negatve connotation. it all depends on the context

Liz (12:14:50 PM): but a word carries a lot f meaning

Travis (12:14:56 PM): yes they do

Autumn (12:15:16 PM): words have power, but i think using 'black' isnt wrong. the nword is.

James (12:15:17 PM): the connotation of a word is what carries meaning

Lauren S (12:15:27 PM): agreed

James (12:15:29 PM): agreed

Liz (12:15:34 PM): hahaha

Liz (12:15:41 PM): we are cute

Lauren S (12:15:46 PM): and the only way we can eliminate the negaive connotation from black is by reintegrating it into our language

Sam (12:15:51 PM): the connotation of a word can be good or bad but its up to you if you let it bother you or not

Lauren S (12:15:54 PM): and not avoiding it

James (12:16:08 PM): thats true too sam

Lauren S (12:16:26 PM): i'm lauren

Liz (12:16:30 PM): yeah but the nword bothers me

James (12:16:36 PM): i was responding to sam

Liz (12:16:40 PM): hahahaha

James (12:16:40 PM): i know oyur lauren

Lauren S (12:16:44 PM): o ok

Travis (12:16:52 PM): well yeah but it really has run its course i think the nword is a 20-30s term

James (12:17:00 PM): i agree with you too lauren

Travis (12:17:04 PM): it really has been weeded out because society says its not appropriate

Sam (12:17:05 PM): im not saying its wrong to be bothered by words its just will you let yourself be destabilized by the use of a word

James (12:17:32 PM): yes

James (12:17:43 PM): i agree with travis and sam

Ian (12:18:01 PM) has left the room.

Autumn (12:18:14 PM): it's easier to generalize groups that you're not a part of

Autumn (12:18:18 PM): yepp

Lauren L (12:18:30 PM): oy

Travis (12:18:30 PM): amen brother

Travis (12:18:43 PM): political correctness is usually dumb

Autumn (12:18:44 PM): yeah political correctness is generally pretty annoying

Sam (12:18:45 PM): yea screw political corectness

Travis (12:18:48 PM): just gotta tell it like it is

Autumn (12:18:56 PM): yeah lets revolt against it!

Travis (12:19:04 PM): way ahead of you hah

Liz (12:19:04 PM): leave it to stephan to open up a can of worms

James (12:19:04 PM): do it!

Travis (12:19:09 PM): hey liz relax

James (12:19:10 PM): yea

Travis (12:19:12 PM): don't be so uptight

Lauren S (12:19:27 PM) has left the room.

Autumn (12:20:06 PM): yeah that would be really weird..

Ashley (12:20:29 PM): that would be weird but i agree with stephan

Travis (12:20:43 PM): yeahh

Ashley (12:20:47 PM): we should just take these traits for what they are and not base any actions by it

Travis (12:20:59 PM): unless you are a republican

James (12:21:05 PM): we should celebrate our differences

Ashley (12:21:10 PM): people look different - get over it

Travis (12:21:16 PM): haha yeahhh they do

James (12:21:16 PM): yup

Liz (12:21:30 PM): ahhhhh

Autumn (12:22:07 PM): ahhhh

Ashley (12:22:29 PM): we should all watch puzzle place

Travis (12:22:34 PM): ??

Ashley (12:25:04 PM): idk

Autumn (12:25:18 PM): this whole convo's bizarre - does it really matter if the question is?

James (12:25:46 PM): haha true that

Autumn (12:26:03 PM): the list on our door!!

Ashley (12:26:03 PM): i think that if its just a visual that is perfectly fine and thats what it should be

Ashley (12:26:33 PM): but if by saying brown thinking arab and by thinking arab your thinking terrorist then its a problem

Lauren L (12:26:40 PM): ummmm. yes there has?

James (12:26:40 PM): yes

Autumn (12:27:56 PM): yeahh they do

Liz (12:28:20 PM): thats y i said wat i said

Lauren L (12:29:07 PM): wait i don't get the ups joke...

Sam (12:29:07 PM): back to what supriya was saying is the word is who you are. i wouldnt be offended if someone called me queer because well i am queer. so it has to do with visuals just as much as who you are

James (12:29:31 PM): yea

James (12:29:45 PM): lauren the joke is 'UPS What can brown do for you?'

James (12:29:50 PM): 'BROWN'

Lauren L (12:29:52 PM): ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

James (12:30:06 PM): good job

Lauren L (12:30:11 PM): shhhhhhhhhhh

James (12:30:15 PM): lol

Ashley (12:31:18 PM): wow laur

James (12:31:29 PM): yea

Lauren L (12:31:35 PM): shhhhhh

James (12:31:47 PM): we're not speaking

Autumn (12:31:57 PM): i know... oops

Autumn (12:32:12 PM): we should get on that but there are so many other people who want to talk...

James (12:32:25 PM): and theres so little time left

Autumn (12:32:32 PM): omg 3minutes

Travis (12:32:35 PM): yeah its not a big deal i dont think

Ashley (12:32:38 PM): yea, everyone has so much to say about this

Travis (12:32:40 PM): i am sooo hungry

Autumn (12:32:48 PM): i didnt realize it was that close to being done!

Travis (12:32:49 PM): just a random aside

Travis (12:32:55 PM): yeahh it went fast today

James (12:33:02 PM): yea

Travis (12:33:03 PM): did you save this?

James (12:33:06 PM): im hungry too

Travis (12:33:07 PM): i lost a bit

Lauren L (12:33:08 PM): haha thanks for sharing trav

Autumn (12:33:10 PM): i'm going to once we're done

Travis (12:33:16 PM): yeah beacuse i got kicked out in there

Travis (12:33:20 PM): so i lost a few minutes

Travis (12:33:22 PM): or stuff

Autumn (12:33:23 PM): but i dont want to miss any last minute comments

Travis (12:33:26 PM): but i have most of it if you need it

Autumn (12:33:36 PM): nope i got it but thnx

James (12:33:43 PM): yup

Travis (12:33:48 PM): alright well only one of us needs to pos ti tright?

Autumn (12:33:53 PM): yeah i'm on it

Travis (12:33:57 PM): good deal

Lauren L (12:34:16 PM): michael jackson syndrome ebecause it lets the margininalized feel closer to the center. which suckkks

Travis (12:34:21 PM): haha

Travis (12:34:23 PM): yeah

Autumn (12:34:41 PM): yeah well screw realists

Travis (12:34:46 PM): amen

Autumn (12:34:54 PM): it shouldnt have connotationslike that

James (12:34:57 PM): thats why ethnic profiling is such a problem

Travis (12:34:58 PM): stupid realists, if there were no realists everyone would be happy

Ashley (12:35:01 PM): realism is blah - i dont like it

Autumn (12:35:04 PM): make up a different word to be derogatory or something

Travis (12:35:10 PM): realism ruins everything

Ashley (12:35:10 PM): yay bffl!!

Ashley (12:35:12 PM): your right

Lauren L (12:35:12 PM): lol. realists also categorize illegal immigrants as "others" so they don't give about helping anyone

Autumn (12:35:20 PM): exactly

James (12:35:29 PM): yea

Travis (12:35:30 PM): ok peace outtt

Autumn (12:35:32 PM): byee

James (12:35:36 PM): later

Lauren L (12:35:39 PM): byee

4 comments:

Rebecca said...

I would like to comment on this aim chat that was posted after last class. Although some of this chat has to do with our class topic, I do not feel that this needs to be posted on the blog. In order to follow a conversation like this, it is difficult to also follow the class conversation, and I don't think it is appropriate to have both going on at the same time, especially with group chats that involve numerous people. None of the topics were necesarily discussed in a very serious manner... I just think that if you disagree or agree with what someone is saying in class, you should speak to the class and not with a small group online.

Emily Jennings said...

How can you say "screw realists"? It seems to me that a lot of you want to live in some happy go-lucky world and that's just not the case. You cannot hate realism, liberalism, or constructivism - they're just theories and it's a way to make sense of the world. In my opinion, liberalism and constructvism are just sub-sections of realism - it's a different way to view the world but overall both are pursuing self-interests which is a realist principle.

Ultimately, I find this entire conversation rather petty and if I'm being honest, annoying. Not only are you not contributing to the class discussion but you're also presenting your ideas in a very unintelligent manner. Saying things like "screw realists" and other things just makes you come off as, quite frankly, stupid. Also, as I read this conversation I realized that very few of you actually stuck to your initial beliefs and continued to flip-flop throughout. I also thought that through this mode of conversation you were making light of a topic that is very serious and controversial.

I know that all of you are extremely intelligent, thoughtful people, but something about this conversation really rubbed me the wrong way. Maybe it's partly to do with the fact that I have to live with you and am forced to hear your voices/laughter/shrieking at 3:00 in the morning when I'm trying to sleep or maybe it's just because it's October and I'm mad that it's still so hot out.

Anyways, I don't want anyone to take this personally, I guess I just am not a fan of the IM Chat Group discussions in the middle of class (which I know comes off as extremely hypocritical since I myself posted an IM conversation the other week).

I guess I just had to get this off my chest.

Autumn said...

wow. I didnt realize that I'd have to defend myself for posting a conversation that I was asked by PTJ to post... I only put it up here because he requested that I do so - excuse me for following directions.

I'd also like to point out that he said at the beginning of the year that we could have aim chats during class - in case you haven't noticed, a lot of people want to speak during class, so it is sometimes hard to get your opinions heard. By im-ing, we can participate in both the discussion (from time to time since it's hard to jump in more than that) and on aim. And just fyi, many of us participating in the aim conversation also participated in the class discussion. We felt that we could not express ALL of our ideas so we did so online; we shared when we could though.

While the aim discussion was not always serious, I dont see why it needs to be; there are times when we were serious and there are others when we were sarcastic or joking. This is what happens on im.

As far as the online conversation being limited to a "small group," I invited everyone in the class who was on AIM whose screenname I had - if you want to participate too, (which it doesnt seem like you do, so dont feel obligated in any way) just let me know and you can be included.

I dont appreciate my words being taken out of context - which I'm sure was not completely clear from the conversation, but I cannot help that. I would just like to say that we were joking around and in all honesty, I tend to lean towards being a realist anyways. I'm sorry if I offended you as that was not my intent; I was only kidding...

Finally, I dont think that a blog comment is the most appropriate place to make a noise complaint. I'm not sure who that comment was directed at, but perhaps you should confront that person/those people face to face in a calm, mature manner rather than through an online rant.

I respect both of your choices not to participate in online chats during class, but I would appreciate it if you would not attack those of us who do. We are doing nothing wrong and although we are discussing class issues in a more lighthearted manner, we do participate in actual discussions as well. If you do not agree, no is making you read the conversation.

cool3cubed said...

Im going to back up Autumn on this and agree with her. PTJ asked her, James, or me to post the blog seeing as how so many people were on it. Also, it was fairly relevant to the class, in my opinion. Lastly, it allowed those of us who were unable to express an opinion to everyone, we were able to do it on aim and further the conversation on aim and in the class. While all of it didn't have relevance to the discussion, or was all that smart; I feel that overall it was a good thing in allowing even more opinions to be expressed during the class.